2013 is in the books!

Discussions related to Solo
dewittpayne
Posts: 1503
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Kingsport, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by dewittpayne »

The 0.975 factor didn't come out of thin air. For example, my Mustang could run STX on 265 maximum section width 140TW tires or ESP on whatever width Hoosiers, usually at least 315, with about the same allowances for suspension mods. The PAX for ESP this year is 0.849. The PAX for STX is 0.827. 0.827/0.849 = 0.974. And the Mustang isn't competitive in STX but is closer in ESP, so for it, Hoosiers probably make a bigger difference than a factor of 0.975. Arguably it will be much worse next year when it's in STU even though you can run 285 section width tires in STU. STU has a PAX almost exactly equal to ESP. Somehow I don't think that the additional 20mm wider section width will add as much performance as a set of much wider Hoosiers.

I suspect that if you compare the PAX's between cars in other ST and SP classes, you'll get about the same difference.
DeWitt Payne
2011 Mustang GT CAM-C

"Tires are meant to die young." Heyward Wagner
steverife
Posts: 9898
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by steverife »

That's apples to cumquats or something...
'16 FRS - PSTX 97
dewittpayne
Posts: 1503
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:19 pm
Location: Kingsport, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by dewittpayne »

steverife wrote:That's apples to cumquats or something...
Really? So what, besides wheels and tires that makes much difference can you do in ESP that you can't do in STX?

Do you think that if Mark had been driving my car instead of Jeff's that he wouldn't have given Shawn a run for his money? He was certainly nearly that much faster than I when he did drive it in September. Do you think that my car wouldn't have been at least 2 seconds faster on Hoosiers? Or more to the point, do you think that JY's car wouldn't have been at least 2 seconds slower on street tires than on Hoosiers?

Either PAX crudely equalizes performance or it doesn't. Right now, it doesn't for Stock class cars on street tires. Look at the Nationals results for RTR and compare to the same model cars on Hoosiers. That's an apples to kumquats thing too.
DeWitt Payne
2011 Mustang GT CAM-C

"Tires are meant to die young." Heyward Wagner
steverife
Posts: 9898
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by steverife »

I'm not really sure what your point is, but you can't really take a single car and use to justify (or disprove) PAX for different classes/categories.

ESP PAX has been set by a heavily developed 3rd generation Firebird and a best of breed WRX.
STX PAX has been set by the FRS/RX8/E36. A Mustang has never been a real factor.
STU PAX has been set by the STi/Evo. A Mustang won't be a factor.

If you are arguing that race tires are faster than street tires, well yeah...
'16 FRS - PSTX 97
User avatar
MARKP
Posts: 10339
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2003 3:51 pm
Location: Farragut, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by MARKP »

There's a lot of difference between ST and SP. To name a few, wheel and tire width, intake and exhaust mods, weight mods, and suspension mods. I don't agree that Hoosiers are worth 2 sec against equivalent ST tires on a typical Pellissippi course.
Mark Pilson
03 Z06 - Sword
09 Mustang - Club
01 Excursion - The safe you dropped from the 10th story
John Brown
Posts: 8798
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:05 am

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by John Brown »

MARKP wrote:There's a lot of difference between ST and SP. To name a few, wheel and tire width, intake and exhaust mods, weight mods, and suspension mods. I don't agree that Hoosiers are worth 2 sec against equivalent ST tires on a typical Pellissippi course.

...so, your saying with any available street tire you could have gotten on the Mustang Sunday... you could have came within 2.0 seconds of your time with the HooHooz??(minus the cones)

ummmmm... Im doubrful. but Iv wanted all year to throw a set of good 275/35/15 on my car and see how close to CSP times I can get.
ETR Pro Class Champion-2002-03-10-11-12-13-14-15
BMW/CCA D-Mod National Road Racing Champion-2011
Pro-Solo Prepared National Champ-2004
Pro-Solo Prepared National Champ-2005
2016 Dodge Challenger SRT 6.4L CAM-C
User avatar
ke0ki2k
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 6:14 pm
Contact:

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by ke0ki2k »

John Brown wrote:
MARKP wrote:There's a lot of difference between ST and SP. To name a few, wheel and tire width, intake and exhaust mods, weight mods, and suspension mods. I don't agree that Hoosiers are worth 2 sec against equivalent ST tires on a typical Pellissippi course.

...so, your saying with any available street tire you could have gotten on the Mustang Sunday... you could have came within 2.0 seconds of your time with the HooHooz??(minus the cones)

ummmmm... Im doubrful. but Iv wanted all year to throw a set of good 275/35/15 on my car and see how close to CSP times I can get.
I'm sure if they made RS3's in 335 he could :lol: Marc has been saying the same thing about his car - 'til he remembers how much they cost.
James Cathers - PFS #192 E92 M3 | TT4 E36 M3
steverife
Posts: 9898
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by steverife »

You guys should split them, and let me borrow two!

I just need some junk 205's for the rear.
'16 FRS - PSTX 97
User avatar
TennTechMan
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:50 pm
Location: Maryville, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by TennTechMan »

MARKP wrote:There's a lot of difference between ST and SP. To name a few, wheel and tire width, intake and exhaust mods, weight mods, and suspension mods.

Add aero to that list. All the fastest SP cars have it.
Aaron Carroll

STM 11 - 91 Geo Metro
Lead Engineer of the Knoxvegas Lowballers
thrdeye
Posts: 14089
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:31 pm
Location: Lenoir City

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by thrdeye »

MARKP wrote:The .975 multiplier gives Jed about 1.3. I'm not sure the Hoosiers are that much help.

All this talk about the .975 multiplier really doesn't mean anything. IMO, "Street" is so screwball that we don't know what the multipliers will be. There are class changes, wheel diameter changes, tire changes, 140 treadwear for one year, etc. To say you can take what we have for 2013 and figure .975 on it is nuts.
You guys kill me. There's no way Hoosiers aren't worth at least 1.5 sec on a 63 second course.

Just like any other number that is assigned to a class, it's not always going to be accurate because so much changes from run to run or event to event. But, my point has always been that .975 is in the right neighborhood and many other regions seem to agree.

Anyway, with the season over, it's a pointless discussion.
Chris Harp
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2018 Toyota Tundra | 2011 BMW M3
John Brown
Posts: 8798
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 11:05 am

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by John Brown »

thrdeye wrote:
MARKP wrote:The .975 multiplier gives Jed about 1.3. I'm not sure the Hoosiers are that much help.

All this talk about the .975 multiplier really doesn't mean anything. IMO, "Street" is so screwball that we don't know what the multipliers will be. There are class changes, wheel diameter changes, tire changes, 140 treadwear for one year, etc. To say you can take what we have for 2013 and figure .975 on it is nuts.
You guys kill me. There's no way Hoosiers aren't worth at least 1.5 sec on a 63 second course.

Just like any other number that is assigned to a class, it's not always going to be accurate because so much changes from run to run or event to event. But, my point has always been that .975 is in the right neighborhood and many other regions seem to agree.

Anyway, with the season over, it's a pointless discussion.
LOL! I agree with ya Chris! Like them HP guys sayin street tires wouldn't slow em down 2 seconds.. :lol:
that's funny.
ETR Pro Class Champion-2002-03-10-11-12-13-14-15
BMW/CCA D-Mod National Road Racing Champion-2011
Pro-Solo Prepared National Champ-2004
Pro-Solo Prepared National Champ-2005
2016 Dodge Challenger SRT 6.4L CAM-C
User avatar
scottgib
Posts: 4050
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:58 am

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by scottgib »

Only a little relevant -- a number of years ago after an event on Victor Racers I changed to a good set of Azenis. On a 40 second course the difference was 1.5 seconds. Since then both the streets and R's have gotten more sticky. I could only guess if the ratio changed. On the Mini S, Hoosiers seem faster than 1.5 sec dif. vs Stones, although the wheels and tire widths were also different. I still think .975 is fairly close.
Old men can still dream!

Scott Gibson
User avatar
integra55
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:04 am

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by integra55 »

if I understand correctly … the .975 only matters for next yr ? after that it becomes Street and everyone is on 200 TW tires ???
“The problems we face today exist because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.”

walter jones
'91 civic CRX, Ford F150, '14 Chevy Sonic

828-686-3245
thrdeye
Posts: 14089
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 12:31 pm
Location: Lenoir City

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by thrdeye »

It shouldn't matter even for next year. I would say there will be a rick ruth pax for the street car classes, just like with any other class now. I would be surprised if the numbers aren't close to base pax*.975 though.
Chris Harp
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2018 Toyota Tundra | 2011 BMW M3
steverife
Posts: 9898
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: 2013 is in the books!

Post by steverife »

PAX isn't a perfect science. It will be a far less perfect science next year, and probably for the next couple of years.
'16 FRS - PSTX 97
Post Reply