Page 3 of 6

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:29 pm
by John Brown
Yep! on Sunday. actually... only one of my mishaps resulted in a real DNF, where I slid past the first salom cone to the left... I tried to move the car during the slide to hit the cones..but couldnt make it. The other DNF was just an off line big long slide.. but, it didnt matter at that point... :lol:

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:16 pm
by JohnSmith
I rather enjoyed both courses that were set up. If I had one wish for a future course at BMS, it would be to add in a proper 7 cone slalom.

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 3:26 pm
by John Brown
JohnSmith wrote:I rather enjoyed both courses that were set up. If I had one wish for a future course at BMS, it would be to add in a proper 7 cone slalom.

WOOT !!!

Thank you fine fellow competitor... Bless your soul! :lol:

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 4:04 pm
by Challenger
Sundays course definitely played out better for me and was a blast to drive. I just kept over driving that back sweeper trying to make up time from Saturday.

Saturday's course was challenging and definitely kept me busy in the car.

Sent from my SM-S765C using Tapatalk

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:15 pm
by jcox07
Got videos loaded on you tube under bms sediv Saturday best run and bms sediv sunday best runs.

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:25 pm
by TBailey
Just wanted to give another round of thanks to JB for shaking down our car after Saturday's race. I think my son seeing that run first hand and watching John drive it that hard probably accomplished more in helping him progress than anything we've done so far. Helped me a ton, too. I had started doubting the car. Thanks John for putting up that time. I appreciate it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 7:49 pm
by timray
I was as lost day one as I've been since starting this game. I just could not find the course in the back. Even after first run debacle and focusing on looking WAY ahead, it just wasn't there for me.
Day 2 was awesome and I found the course easy. The event was kinda like my national tour events, I'm horrible on day 1 and at least not embarrassing on day 2.
No matter though. Awesome weekend racing and not at work!

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:14 pm
by MARKP
I enjoyed Sunday's course a lot more than Saturday. Saturday was just really busy and didn't have much flow to me. Sunday was a blast. No complaints there at all. Thanks to Jeff for the hard work.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:33 pm
by oldmuscle69
I think we all need to go and get our heads examined (upper external)

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2016 11:06 pm
by Teufelshund
I agree with Mark. Sunday's course was a blast! The back section was probably my favorite.

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:15 am
by joker717
Are you guys finished with the results? It's showing me ahead of Lin which I don't think is right considering that I had 2 counted DNFS from Saturday which put me are least 20 seconds behind goino into Sunday. I was just wondering how much time I made up after it was finished.

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:31 am
by jcox07
You are correct JR , your total time should have been 396.873 and Lin's should have been 381.263 and coldbeers time is correct.

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:21 am
by jcox07
I just ran the numbers for this weekends event if we had used only the one fast run from each day the results would be below, but I really do like this format better. The results would have been

McCrary 90.506
R.C. 90.616
JB 90.930
JY 90.940
Pilson 91.083
Harp 91.850
EDIT I would have ran a 90.940 as my fastest time on day one was my 4th run which can't be used

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:36 am
by 90civichb
jcoatney wrote:I just looked at the results. Top raw and PAX. I did a lot better than I thought.
I lol'd :lol:

Re: Bristol SEDIV.

Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:57 am
by John Brown
jcox07 wrote:I just ran the numbers for this weekends event if we had used only the one fast run from each day the results would be below, but I really do like this format better. The results would have been

McCrary 90.506
R.C. 90.616
JB 90.930
JY 90.940
Pilson 91.083
Harp 91.850
EDIT I would have ran a 90.940 as my fastest time on day one was my 4th run which can't be used
thats amazing.. being consistent IS HARD!!! Close 3rd normal scoring... SUCKING AZZ, Rally scoring. :lol:

:(