new approach to video runs

Discussions related to Solo
Post Reply
marknoakes
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:21 pm

new approach to video runs

Post by marknoakes »

Would SCCA rules allow the use of this to video runs? It would make for some cool videos though the cars would outrun it on larger tracks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcEnThx2440

I'm a robotics, mechatronics, additive manufacturing type so would naturally gravitate to this kind of solution. Dumb or cool, even if expensive?

PS...I've been so swamped at work including evenings and weekends that I haven't be able to even touch the Vette to get it fixed to run...will definitely miss the August event as well as far as driving goes...may be able to come spectate for a couple of hours.

Mark N
RxCritical
Posts: 1642
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 8:31 pm
Location: Lenoir City, Tn

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by RxCritical »

Very cool.
However it's a DRONE!
SCCA events are a NO DRONE ZONE! :pirate:
Paul M.
C8 #34 SS
Team Canopy
MikeKelly
Posts: 1367
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:44 am
Location: Knoxville TN

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by MikeKelly »

marknoakes wrote:Dumb or cool, even if expensive?
Coolest autocross videos I've ever seen...

Specifically banned by the SCCA (and others) due to "tort law thieves" and insurance companies.


See here: http://forum.etrscca.org/viewtopic.php? ... lit=drones

And here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_liability

How we came to end up at strict liability for "toys": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstown_Flood


One of my pet peeves...
Mike Kelly
"Still got the shovel..."
--Mr. Rate
steverife
Posts: 9898
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 9:55 am
Location: Knoxville, TN

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by steverife »

I think SCCA reacted to an incident where one crashed on course in Texas.

Sent from my HTC One V using Tapatalk
'16 FRS - PSTX 97
MikeKelly
Posts: 1367
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:44 am
Location: Knoxville TN

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by MikeKelly »

steverife wrote:I think SCCA reacted to an incident where one crashed on course in Texas.
Fair enough.

What's the bigger (absolutely uninsurable) problem?
Mike Kelly
"Still got the shovel..."
--Mr. Rate
marknoakes
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 10:21 pm

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by marknoakes »

Why did I have a gut feeling that there would be some kind of rule against this?

So per the links a tethered dirigible with the same auto-tracking camera technology would be ok?

Mark N
rocket71
Posts: 687
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 1:00 pm
Location: Chattanooga

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by rocket71 »

marknoakes wrote:Why did I have a gut feeling that there would be some kind of rule against this?

So per the links a tethered dirigible with the same auto-tracking camera technology would be ok?

Mark N
I love outside the box thinking. Tethered dirible, that's an awesome idea. Plus, I just like saying, tethered dirigible.
GT350
MikeKelly
Posts: 1367
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:44 am
Location: Knoxville TN

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by MikeKelly »

rocket71 wrote:I just like saying, tethered dirigible.
Of course you do, lol. :lol:


But I think you lose the coolness of panning approaching / following shots, such as here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JK4-kG4 ... e=youtu.be

And for where it goes from there: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sq ... ial-camera


What's next? Who knows...

Fascinating stuff (but completely uninsurable).
Mike Kelly
"Still got the shovel..."
--Mr. Rate
TedV
Posts: 6219
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2003 5:55 pm

Re: new approach to video runs

Post by TedV »

marknoakes wrote:Why did I have a gut feeling that there would be some kind of rule against this?

So per the links a tethered dirigible with the same auto-tracking camera technology would be ok?

Mark N
In a previous thread, I pointed out a tethered blimp. :wink: A dirigible crashing at an event?? Oh the humanity!
Ted V.
don't make me list all my VW's
Post Reply